Transnational online service
Ualtimos Pirentex team working on chatbot analytics dashboards
About Ualtimos Pirentex

Where chatbot data becomes clarity

Since 2019, we have been building tools and group learning environments that help teams read chatbot performance the way engineers read circuit diagrams — precisely, collaboratively, and with a clear sense of what to fix next.

See what we offer
Our story

A team built around structured group work

Ualtimos Pirentex started as a small analytics consultancy focused on one specific problem: most teams measuring chatbot performance were doing it alone, without a shared framework or anyone to pressure-test their conclusions.

We built a group-first platform where practitioners work through real datasets together — 6 to 12 participants per cohort, 8-week structured programs, facilitated by specialists with at least 4 years of hands-on chatbot deployment experience. The format is deliberately tight because accountability and peer feedback are harder to fake in small groups.

Participants collaborating during a live chatbot analytics session
  • Countries represented in active cohorts 31
  • Average cohort size 9
  • Program weeks per cohort 8
  • Facilitators with 4+ years experience 14
By the numbers

Chatbot analytics at scale

1,400 + Practitioners trained across group cohorts
63 cohorts Completed programs with structured peer review
4.8 / 5 Average facilitator rating across all programs
Live analytics dashboard review during group session
Team reviewing chatbot performance metrics together
How we work

Group synergy is not a side effect — it's the mechanism

Most chatbot analytics training focuses on individual skill. We think that misses the point: real performance problems get solved when 3 people with different contexts look at the same data and disagree productively.

Each program runs on a fixed weekly rhythm — 2 live sessions per week, asynchronous dataset work in between, and a structured peer-review protocol on session 4 and session 7. Facilitators do not lecture; they surface disagreements and keep the group moving toward a shared diagnostic framework. Participants come from product, engineering, and operations backgrounds, and that mix is intentional — chatbot performance looks different depending on who's measuring it.

Program structure in detail
2 Live sessions per week, each 90 minutes with facilitated discussion
Session 4 & 7 Structured peer-review checkpoints built into every cohort
3 roles Product, engineering, and operations perspectives in each group
Facilitator leading a chatbot analytics group session

Darya Velychko

Lead Facilitator

Darya has run 28 cohorts since joining in 2020, with a background in NLP pipeline auditing. She designs the peer-review protocols used across all programs.

Ostap Hrynchuk

Analytics Curriculum Lead

Ostap built the diagnostic framework that participants use to evaluate chatbot drop-off rates, intent mismatch, and session depth across 11 metric categories.

Ivet Szabo

Group Process Specialist

Ivet focuses on the group dynamics side — how cohorts move from surface-level data reading to genuine diagnostic disagreement. She trains all incoming facilitators on the protocol.